statement:20211008foreignersrights
差分
このページの2つのバージョン間の差分を表示します。
| statement:20211008foreignersrights [2021/10/08 19:17] – 作成 michinobumaeda | statement:20211008foreignersrights [2023/04/13 19:38] (現在) – michinobumaeda | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 行 7: | 行 7: | ||
| - | <html> | + | <HTML> |
| <p style=" | <p style=" | ||
| October 8, 2021</ | October 8, 2021</ | ||
| - | </html> | + | </HTML> |
| On September 22, 2021, the Tokyo High Court ruled that the Japanese government violated the Constitution when it deported two Sri Lankan men without giving them an opportunity to take legal action against its decision to reject their applications for refugee status. The Court admitted that the Immigration Services Agency’s approach was against Article 32 of the Japanese Constitution which ensures the right of “access to the courts.” These Sri Lankan nationals’ demand for a detention moratorium in December 2014 had been rejected. After the notification that their appeal against the rejection of refugee status was dismissed, they had planned to contact lawyers. The following day, however, they were deported in spite of the regulation that the contestants should not be repatriated during their appeal. The judiciary pointed out that the Immigration Services Agency had intentionally postponed the notification of decision issued 40 days beforehand, expecting implementation of repatriation before the lawsuit and had deprived them of their time for legal procedure. | On September 22, 2021, the Tokyo High Court ruled that the Japanese government violated the Constitution when it deported two Sri Lankan men without giving them an opportunity to take legal action against its decision to reject their applications for refugee status. The Court admitted that the Immigration Services Agency’s approach was against Article 32 of the Japanese Constitution which ensures the right of “access to the courts.” These Sri Lankan nationals’ demand for a detention moratorium in December 2014 had been rejected. After the notification that their appeal against the rejection of refugee status was dismissed, they had planned to contact lawyers. The following day, however, they were deported in spite of the regulation that the contestants should not be repatriated during their appeal. The judiciary pointed out that the Immigration Services Agency had intentionally postponed the notification of decision issued 40 days beforehand, expecting implementation of repatriation before the lawsuit and had deprived them of their time for legal procedure. | ||
| 行 31: | 行 31: | ||
| 日本科学者会議（JSA）国際部は、2021年9月22日の東京高裁判決を支持するとともに、より多くの日本人が外国人の権利と尊厳について考えるリベラルな雰囲気を歓迎する。伝統的に、日本は難民受け入れにも消極的だった。私たちは、出入国管理および難民政策における根本的な変化を望む。それと並んで強調されるべきこととして、市民、とりわけ科学者には、国籍を理由に差別されない多文化社会の発展を支持して取り組みを強化することが求められている。 | 日本科学者会議（JSA）国際部は、2021年9月22日の東京高裁判決を支持するとともに、より多くの日本人が外国人の権利と尊厳について考えるリベラルな雰囲気を歓迎する。伝統的に、日本は難民受け入れにも消極的だった。私たちは、出入国管理および難民政策における根本的な変化を望む。それと並んで強調されるべきこととして、市民、とりわけ科学者には、国籍を理由に差別されない多文化社会の発展を支持して取り組みを強化することが求められている。 | ||
| - | <html> | + | <HTML> |
| <p style=" | <p style=" | ||
| 日本科学者会議国際部</ | 日本科学者会議国際部</ | ||
| - | </html> | + | </HTML> |
statement/20211008foreignersrights.1633688273.txt.gz · 最終更新: 2021/10/08 19:17 by michinobumaeda